Compare Gmail-integrated CRM tools including Tooling Studio Sales CRM, Streak, Copper, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, Salesforce, and Capsule.

The best CRM integrated with Gmail depends on the kind of workflow you want.
This list is framed for Google Workspace teams choosing a CRM by daily workflow, not by the longest feature checklist.
| CRM | Best for | Gmail fit | Main tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tooling Studio Sales CRM | Small Google Workspace teams that want contacts, organizations, deals, and shared pipelines close to Gmail | Chrome extension workflow built for Gmail and Google Contacts users | Newer and intentionally lighter than large CRM suites |
| Streak | Teams that want pipeline work directly inside Gmail | Fully embedded Gmail CRM experience | Inbox-centric model may not fit teams that want more separate CRM structure |
| Copper | Google Workspace teams that want a mature CRM rollout | Strong Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Google Workspace positioning | More setup and heavier platform feel than a lightweight CRM |
| HubSpot CRM | Teams that need sales, marketing, service, and reporting breadth | Gmail extension and connected inbox support | Can become more platform than a small team needs |
| Pipedrive | Sales teams that want pipeline management with email sync | Gmail add-on and Google Workspace integrations | Work still centers on Pipedrive more than Gmail |
| Zoho CRM | Cost-conscious teams that want a broad CRM suite | Gmail and Google Workspace integrations | More configuration choices to manage |
| Salesforce | Larger teams with complex CRM requirements | Gmail integration through Salesforce tooling | Heavy rollout and admin overhead |
| Capsule | Small teams that want simple contact and pipeline management | Google Workspace-friendly contact workflow | Less Gmail-native than embedded inbox tools |
Tooling Studio Sales CRM is the lightweight choice for small teams that already work from Gmail and Google Contacts.
It gives users shared pipelines, contacts, organizations, deals, notes, tags, custom fields, owners, comments, attachments, and follow-up work without asking the team to run a large CRM program first.
Best fit:
Tradeoff: it is intentionally narrower than HubSpot, Salesforce, or Copper. That is a strength when adoption matters more than enterprise reporting. It is a limitation if the company already needs advanced forecasting and revenue operations.
Start here: Tooling Studio Sales CRM.
Streak is one of the clearest examples of a CRM built directly into Gmail. It is a strong fit for users who want pipeline records, email context, and follow-up work to stay inside the inbox experience.
Best fit:
Tradeoff: the same inbox-first model that makes Streak appealing can feel too tied to Gmail for teams that want a more separate CRM workspace.
Copper is a mature CRM with strong Google Workspace positioning. It is built for teams that want CRM close to Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and the broader Google environment.
Best fit:
Tradeoff: it can be more than a small team wants to configure, train, and pay for.
Related: Copper alternative comparison.
HubSpot is a broad CRM and go-to-market platform. Its Gmail tools are useful when the team wants email logging, inbox access, templates, sequences, and CRM context tied to a larger sales and marketing system.
Best fit:
Tradeoff: small teams may find themselves managing more product surface than they need.
Pipedrive is strongest as a sales pipeline CRM. Its Gmail add-on and email sync help teams connect email activity to contacts, deals, and activities while keeping the main sales workflow in Pipedrive.
Best fit:
Tradeoff: if your team wants most CRM work to happen inside Gmail, Pipedrive may feel more connected than embedded.
These tools fit different kinds of teams.
Zoho CRM is useful when a team wants a broad CRM suite with many modules and a lower-cost entry point.
Salesforce is the enterprise choice when CRM has to support complex sales process, reporting, governance, and integration needs.
Capsule is a simpler relationship-management option for teams that want contacts and pipelines without a huge implementation.
For Google Workspace teams, the key question is whether Gmail is the main working surface or just one connected channel.
Use these questions before comparing pricing pages:
If the honest answer is that the team needs simple shared follow-up near Gmail, start lighter. If the team already needs complex reporting and sales ops, choose a broader platform early.
For small Google Workspace teams, start with the least heavy CRM that still gives you shared ownership, visible stages, and reliable follow-up.
If Gmail and Google Contacts are already where work starts, Tooling Studio Sales CRM is the cleanest fit. If you want a mature Google Workspace CRM, compare Copper. If you want the deepest Gmail-embedded CRM brand, compare Streak. If you need a broader sales and marketing platform, compare HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, or Salesforce.
For the contact-data side of the decision, read the Google Contacts CRM guide.
Tooling Studio Sales CRM gives Gmail and Google Contacts teams a lightweight pipeline: contacts, organizations, deals, notes, tags, custom fields, owners, and shared follow-up work without a heavy CRM rollout.